M&
Moelis & Co (MC)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 revenue surged to $438.7M, up 104% year over year, with diluted EPS of $1.15 GAAP and $1.18 adjusted; Q4 adjusted pre-tax margin reached 31.4% as average fees per completed transaction increased with particular strength in M&A .
- Management raised the regular quarterly dividend 8% to $0.65, citing strong cash and no debt, and emphasized record pipeline and improved deal conversion into 2025 .
- Non-comp expenses held at 11.4% of revenue in Q4 (adjusted), while CFO guided 2025 underlying non-comp run-rate up roughly 15% on tech, occupancy and T&E as headcount grows .
- S&P Global Wall Street consensus estimates for Q4 2024 revenue/EPS were unavailable during retrieval; comparison vs estimates is therefore not included (S&P Global data unavailable).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Q4 revenue and EPS inflected sharply: revenues $438.7M (+104% YoY) and adjusted diluted EPS $1.18; management attributed strength to higher average fees per completed transaction and strong M&A activity .
- Operating leverage improved: Q4 adjusted compensation ratio at 58.4%, non-comp at 11.4%, delivering 31.4% adjusted pre-tax margin; CFO expects continued leverage while investing in growth .
- Strategic investments paid off: Technology was the largest 2024 sector contributor; Industrials and Energy were active; Capital Markets had a strong year and serves as a “strategic weapon” as dealmaking accelerates .
- Pipeline and conversion improved: CEO cited record pipeline levels and faster conversion post-election, with minimal “pull-forward” effects in Q4 .
What Went Wrong
- Expenses rose with growth: Q4 adjusted compensation expenses increased vs prior year due to higher bonus accruals; full-year adjusted non-comp expenses increased broad-based with business expansion .
- 2025 cost outlook: CFO guided a ~15% increase in underlying non-comp run-rate driven by tech, occupancy, and client events, creating a near-term headwind to operating leverage .
- Regulatory delays: Some Q4 deals were pushed from Q4 to Q2 2025 due to regulatory timing, tempering near-term quarterly annualization assumptions despite strong momentum .
Financial Results
Quarterly Performance vs Prior Periods
Notes:
- Q4 YoY comparison: Revenue $438.7M vs $214.9M (+104%); GAAP diluted EPS $1.15 vs $(0.08); adjusted diluted EPS $1.18 vs $(0.06) .
- Q4 adjusted pre-tax margin: 31.4%; FY 2024 adjusted pre-tax margin: 16.4% .
Segment/Revenue Mix (Context)
Key KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Technology was the largest sector contributor to our 2024 revenues… Industrials and Energy sectors have also been quite active. And the Capital Markets Group had a strong year and continues to be a strategic weapon as dealmaking accelerates” .
- CEO: “Our pipeline is at the highest levels ever… We’re building backlog faster than it is converting… conversion did pick up [post-election]” .
- CFO: “Adjusted compensation expense ratio was 58.4% for the fourth quarter and 69% for the full year… noncomp expense ratio was 11.4% for the fourth quarter and 15.9% for the full year… pretax margin of 31.4% for the fourth quarter and 16.4% for the full year” .
- CFO: “In 2025, we anticipate noncompensation expenses to trend higher… driven by adds to headcount, UK space build-out, client events, and tech/information services” (underlying run-rate ~15% increase) .
- Capital return stance: “We increased the dividend… We will return the capital… may be stock repurchases… determined by us, the Board, the market” .
Q&A Highlights
- Backdrop and conversion: Seasonality helped, but Q4 felt different; conversion accelerated post-election, pipeline at highs, minimal pull-forward .
- 2025 non-comp outlook: Underlying non-comp run-rate up ~15% excluding transaction costs due to headcount, space, client events, and tech .
- Revenue mix: About 60% full-year revenue was M&A; remainder capital markets and restructuring .
- Compensation leverage: As comp ratio nears low-60s, incremental leverage becomes asymptotic; 2025 leverage exists but tempered by investment (e.g., PFA build-out) .
- Capital return and share count: Dividend up; buybacks possible; clarified year-over-year share count comparison due to GAAP basics vs diluted accounting in loss periods .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global Wall Street consensus estimates for Q4 2024 revenue and EPS were unavailable at time of retrieval, so estimate comparisons could not be provided (S&P Global data unavailable).
- Implications: Following the strong Q4 revenue/EPS and improved operating leverage, analysts may adjust models for higher revenue run-rate, improved comp leverage trajectory, and higher non-comp underlying costs into 2025, as well as updated capital return assumptions (dividend/base case) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Revenue inflection: Q4 revenue of $438.7M and adjusted EPS $1.18 reflect stronger deal conversion and higher average fees; M&A led mix (~60% FY), supported by active Industrials/Energy and robust Capital Markets .
- Operating leverage: Adjusted comp ratio improved to 58.4% in Q4 with non-comp at 11.4%, driving 31.4% adjusted pre-tax margin; path to low-60s comp ratio exists but will slow as it nears market levels .
- 2025 cost trajectory: Plan for ~15% increase in underlying non-comp run-rate (tech, occupancy, T&E) as the firm scales, partially offsetting leverage near term; model fuller-year expenses accordingly .
- Capital return signals: Dividend increased to $0.65 amid strong cash and no debt; buybacks remain a potential lever depending on market and board decisions .
- Pipeline strength and timing: Record backlog and improved conversion support momentum into 2025; some Q4 deals delayed to Q2 by regulatory timing—avoid over-annualizing Q4 .
- Strategic expansion: Tech now a leading sector, with continued build-out in Industrials/Energy and a new Global Head of Private Funds Advisory to scale PFA capabilities—expect expanding sponsor-related opportunities .
- Tax/EPS sensitivity: Near-term Q1 EPS can benefit from RSU vesting price vs $41 adjusted grant price (about $0.01 per $1.25 delta); incorporate this sensitivity into Q1 models .